Subprime loans are loans with less
favorable terms than that of a prime loan. The terms are usually less favorable
because the person in question has either poor credit or does not have the
necessary income to support or warrant the extension of credit. There are risks
involved for the lenders, and for the borrowers. Lenders run the risk of never
getting their money back or having it take a long time to see any return on
their investment. So in order to absorb some of the risk there are stipulations
often added to help insure the lender will get their money back. This often
includes adjustable interest and ballooning payments (Smith, & Hevener,
2014) for the life of the loan. Many of
the borrowers of subprime loans tend to be African Americans. Many African
Americans are served in their loans by agents that specialize in higher rate
loans regardless of their total income (Beeman, Glasberg, & Casey, 2011),
this speaks to the other issues of subprime loans and predatory lending that
cause us to question the leadership in institutions and the ethics involved in
the decision making process. However this is not just because African Americans
are less likely than their white counterparts to receive home loans from any
sources, because they are more likely to accept subprime loans and therefore
are more likely to be victims of predatory lending (Lacy, 2012). This begs the question of why subprime loans
are pushed more towards minorities. It seems to me that the only way to grow
the amount of home owners is to either allow those who can’t qualify for prime
rate loans to work towards a prime rate loan, or create a separate type of loan
that would provide a pathway for those who might never get to a place
financially that would allow them to take advantage of a prime rate loan.
However in the creation of these types of loans there should be added safety policies
that protect the borrowers from those who would harm them and seek to make
money off of their circumstances outside of the additional assessment of
interest or payment obligations. This would assist leadership in making ethical
decisions about what a borrower can afford and how they can still make money
off of the transaction.
No comments:
Post a Comment